boundary-code-audit-vs-security-ops
evals/boundary-code-audit-vs-security-ops ↑ +100.0 pts with plugin 100%Results
✓ pass expected-agent
matched ^\s*(bopen-tools:)?(code-auditor)\s*$
✓ pass expected-agent
matched ^\s*(bopen-tools:)?(code-auditor)\s*$
✓ pass expected-agent
matched ^\s*(bopen-tools:)?(code-auditor)\s*$
✗ fail expected-agent
pattern not found in last_message
✗ fail expected-agent
pattern not found in last_message
✗ fail expected-agent
pattern not found in last_message
Prompt
Audit this pull request diff for injection risks before we merge it.
Reply with only the subagent_type you would delegate to, exactly as it appears in your agent list, and nothing else. If no available agent fits and you would handle this yourself, reply with exactly NONE. Do not call any tool.
Graders — what "good" means for this case
"last_message""^\\s*(bopen-tools:)?(code-auditor)\\s*$""""contains"